Should I Purchase Mortgage Life Insurance?
I recently read an article by Talbot Boggs of the Canadian Press (June 30, 2010). Though I agreed with most points made in the article, I disagree with the suggestion that a borrower should purchase mortgage insurance as an option if offered by the lender.
Firstly, the mortgage balance will be declining but the insurance premium will remain consistent, hence over time, the borrower will be receiving less. Secondly, if you decide to port (move) your mortgage to another lender when the term is up, the insurance will not be transferable.
I propose that if a borrower wishes to have the additional security offered by insurance (and I totally agree) then an insurance policy outside of the mortgage contract should be considered. This insurance can be a fixed term or whole life policy.
There are several advantages to this strategy:
Firstly, the policy is with the borrower and stays with the borrower no matter who holds the mortgage.
Secondly, the borrower can pick an amount that is appropriate to their situation. He or she does not have to purchase an amount to pay off the full mortgage.
Thirdly, the amount of payout from the “life” insurance remains consistent.
Finally, and probably most importantly, in the event of the demise (death) of the borrower, cash from the policy will go to the beneficiary. The beneficiary, who often is the spouse, will have money to make mortgage payments, pay utility bills, buy food, etc. for the family while they get their life adjusted to the new situation.
It makes no sense to have a debt free house if the hydro, water, gas and telephone are disconnected. This is a morbid subject, but it needs to be considered by all borrowers.
P.S. Be sure to obtain competitive quotes from a few life insurance agents before committing.
Jeffery Moses
