Victoria Mortgage Investment Corporation

Archive for July, 2010

Should I Purchase Mortgage Life Insurance?

July 23rd, 2010 | Leave a Reply »

I recently read an article by Talbot Boggs of the Canadian Press (June 30, 2010). Though I agreed with most points made in the article, I disagree with the suggestion that a borrower should purchase mortgage insurance as an option if offered by the lender.

Firstly, the mortgage balance will be declining but the insurance premium will remain consistent, hence over time, the borrower will be receiving less. Secondly, if you decide to port (move) your mortgage to another lender when the term is up, the insurance will not be transferable.

I propose that if a borrower wishes to have the additional security offered by insurance (and I totally agree) then an insurance policy outside of the mortgage contract should be considered. This insurance can be a fixed term or whole life policy.

There are several advantages to this strategy:

Firstly, the policy is with the borrower and stays with the borrower no matter who holds the mortgage.

Secondly, the borrower can pick an amount that is appropriate to their situation. He or she does not have to purchase an amount to pay off the full mortgage.

Thirdly, the amount of payout from the “life” insurance remains consistent.

Finally, and probably most importantly, in the event of the demise (death) of the borrower, cash from the policy will go to the beneficiary. The beneficiary, who often is the spouse, will have money to make mortgage payments, pay utility bills, buy food, etc. for the family while they get their life adjusted to the new situation.

It makes no sense to have a debt free house if the hydro, water, gas and telephone are disconnected. This is a morbid subject, but it needs to be considered by all borrowers.

P.S. Be sure to obtain competitive quotes from a few life insurance agents before committing.

Jeffery Moses

Your Asset Mix and Retirement Goals

July 15th, 2010 | 1 Comment »

Money Managers will often refer to risk as being the level of uncertainty about the returns expected from an investment. In most cases risk can simply be defined as the amount of volatility compared to a projected market return. You might also define risk as the amount of money you think you could lose and still sleep through the night.

In my opinion, being able to understand what you are invested in, and why, is very important when considering taking financial risks. A good test is to ask, “Could I explain to a 12 year old in less than a minute why I hold a particular asset in my investment portfolio?” It should be that simple.

Some years ago two researchers, Martin Leibowitz and Terence Langetieg of Salomon Brothers Inc., issued a report to the pension fund industry called, “Shortfall Risks and the Asset Allocation Decision”. In this report they used widely accepted historical return data compiled by the firm Ibotson Associates. The report found that there was a 36% chance that stocks would underperform bonds in any five year period. They also found that there was a 24% chance that stocks will underperform bonds in any 20 year period. Of course, that also means that there was a 76% chance that stocks would outperform bonds in any 20 year period.

As many Canadians are now starting to look at retirement, over the coming years it will become prudent to rebalance RRSP investment portfolios to decrease future investment risk. Using standard return and risk assumptions and a five year time horizon, Leibowitz and Langetieg concluded that an asset allocation of 30% stock and 70% bonds would result in a higher probability that an investor would meet their goals.

When constructing a fixed income bond portfolio the Money Manager will consider interest rates, maturities, redemption options and the credit rating of the bond issuer. The Managers would normally structure the portfolio with a mix of government, provincial, municipal and corporate bonds. In order for an Investor to reduce investment risk they might consider replacing the corporate bonds in the fixed income/bond portion of their investment portfolio with quality Canadian first mortgages. In addition to increasing the interest yield on your portfolio, an investment in first mortgages can offer substantially increased security when compared to corporate bonds as an asset class.

First Accredit Mortgage Corp., a Mortgage Investment Corporation (MIC) managed by Great Pacific Mortgage & Investment Ltd., invests exclusively in first mortgages. Since 2002, this MIC has offered both large and small investors easy access to investment in Canadian first mortgages while producing an annual historic yield in the range of 7.95% to 10.95%.

Paul E. Croy

Blog

Canadian Mortgage Rates and the World Financial Market

Canadian bankers are, by nature, a conservative lot. This is partly due to the mandated procedures and policies they are given by The Office...

Read More »

MIC

It’s your money. Make the most of it.
$5,000 minimum investment

Read More »

Results

6-14% since 1994

Read More »